A
CHALLENGE TO JOURNALISTS (III)
Who were the "journalists" paid by the U.S.
government and why were they hired to do what they
did?
Ricardo
Alarcón de Quesada, President of the Cuban
Parliament
•
THE habeas corpus relief petitions
on behalf of the five Cubans unjustly sentenced in
the United States and, in particular, the affidavit
submitted by Martin Garbus, Gerardo Hernández’
lawyer, primarily focus on the role played by "journalists"
who, in the pay of the U.S. government, created an
atmosphere of hysteria and irrational hatred which
terrorized the jury into finding them guilty despite
the prosecution’s lack of evidence. Worse still, the
prosecution acknowledged that it could not
substantiate the principal charge.
Nevertheless, this is not a
confrontation of the Five and their defense with
journalism and journalists; in fact, quite the
opposite.
In addition to being in violation of
the U.S. Constitution and the regulations of due
process, the operation mounted by the prosecution in
Miami was also an insult to a profession which
deserves respect. It was a Miami newspaper – The
Miami Herald – which first revealed the
existence of this secret operation, in which some of
its own journalists participated. They were sacked
for what the editor considered a violation of
journalistic ethics.
The author of the revelation, Oscar
Corral, paid a high price for sticking to the rules
of his profession. Instead of receiving a prize for
his investigative work, he was subjected to, in his
own words, "a campaign orchestrated to intimidate,
harass and silence. It was concentrated artillery
fire." He added that certain threats were very
specific and his family was mentioned, prompting his
editors to move them to a place of safety.
Genuine journalism was also a victim
of government deceit.
But, who were the government paid "journalists"
and why were they hired to do what they did?
All of them, without exception, were
members of or closely linked to Miami organizations
cultivating violence and terrorism, and some of them
are themselves convicted and confessed terrorists;
some had previously worked in journalism and were
capable of writing a couple of pages, while others
had never passed the entrance exam to any school of
journalism; all of them have a lot of experience as
provocateurs and assiduously participate in radio
and television programs characterized by the
brazenness and stridency of those openly advocating
the use of force against Cuba. All of them met the
criteria to be hired by Washington to fulfill a
clandestine task. In other words, they were people
who could be trusted, and that is why they were
given the job and paid generously because, after all,
they didn’t use money from their own pockets but
that of taxpayers.
All of them were paid out of budgets
for Radio and TV Martí, which are government
enterprises, funded by the federal budget which is
fed by taxes and other public contributions; in
other words, U.S. citizens and residents. However,
those who without knowing it, payrolled them, knew
nothing about this covert operation.
For this reason, Garbus’ affidavit
emphasizes that this is an issue of exceptional
importance. Above all, for our five compatriots who
have now served 14 years of their sentences. But it
is also important, very much so, for those who are
not in prison.
It is particularly important for
genuine journalists, without quote marks, those who
honestly exercise a professional which others have
prostituted and turned into an instrument for the
kidnapping of five innocent men.
At the end of his affidavit, Garbus
mentions the U.S. Attorney General: "Attorney
General Eric Holder Jr. was not responsible for this
prosecution when it began. He is now."
Journalism professionals and the
printed media outside of Miami were not responsible
for this crime when it took place. But now that they
know what happened they cannot evade their
responsibility. Silence now would be complicity.
(From
www.antiterroristas.cu)