CASE OF THE CUBAN FIVE
U.S. Supreme Court decision under continuing
condemnation

THE United States Supreme Court decision not to
review the case of the Cuban Five, imprisoned in
that country for close to 11 years for combating
terrorism, continues to be criticized by many
different groups and individuals in Cuba and the
rest of the world who believe that true justice
would be the immediate release of these anti-terrorist
fighters.
Jacinto Suárez, Nicaragua’s deputy to the Central
American Parliament (Parlacen), stated that the
Court’s decision is highly politicized, because "everybody
knows about the flaws in the trial of the Cuban
fighters," PL reported. "In legal terms, there is no
evidence palpably proving that the Five were — to
state it in U.S. terms — spying on Washington’s
national security interests."
Suárez, who is also international relations
secretary of the Sandinista National Liberation
Front (FSLN), emphasized that the court decision is
in the context of hostility toward Cuba.
"Our obligation is to keep fighting on that front
until the court makes the right decision,
juridically speaking, which is to free the Five. The
fact that it has refused to review the case does not
mean that we should lower our banner; we are going
to keep on fighting for their freedom.
"It must be understood that Barack Obama has a
responsibility. If he desists and withdraws the
charges, they walk free," Suárez emphasized.
Likewise, Miguel de Castilla, Nicaraguan minister
of education, emphasized that this action by the
highest court of justice in the United States,
reveals the hypocrisy of an entire system which
attacks other nations and creates bases for
terrorism.
Assessing the double standards of Washington’s
policy, De Castilla said that the United States is
financing terrorist processes against various
countries in the world while proclaiming itself a
standard bearer in the world against such acts.
For his part, Fernando Jaime, general secretary
of the Angola-Cuba Friendship Association,
reiterated its commitment to keeping the struggle
alive, and noted that the petition for the case’s
review was based on the opinions of hundreds of
prominent individuals around the world and within
the United States itself, including 10 Nobel
laureates.
Meanwhile, Fidel Chiriboga, president of the
National Coordinating Committee of Friendship with
Cuba in Ecuador, said that "these five men need
international support to end the silence of the U.S.
media and the White House, and to inform the U.S.
people of the barbarity committed by that nation’s
judicial system."
In the same way, the Madrid Committee to Free the
Five issued a statement saying that the Supreme
Court decision is a clear example of the injustice
prevailing in that country. "Imprisoned without
evidence, they (the Five) were submitted to a rigged
trial, plagued with irregularities and human rights
violations.
"The same judicial system that has denied the
possibility of reviewing the case is harboring and
protecting notorious terrorists like Posada
Carriles, a self-confessed terrorist, wanted by
Venezuela, where he was serving prison time until he
escaped with the invaluable help of the yankee
secret services, the connivance of the U.S.
government and the corruption of a Venezuelan
official. Now he is at liberty in the United States
in the company of other terrorists, like Orlando
Bosch, Basulto and Frómeta, to name just a few.
"The independence of U.S. justice, so much
defended and publicized by its successive
governments, can be seen in this case as the most
absolute fallacy.
"We, the peoples of the Spanish state, demand the
release of the five Cubans, an end to this colossal
injustice, and immediate freedom for the Cuban
patriots. We will be tireless. We do not believe in
defeat when we are defending the truth," the
statement reads.
Similarly, in a systematic and ongoing way,
solidarity associations and groups in France
sympathizing with the Cuban Revolution are
reiterating actions of publicly speaking out on
behalf of the Five. Most recently, they did at Place
de la Concorde, with huge banners and placards.
Prensa Latina reported that tourists walking
across the Concorde on their way to the
Champs-Elysées observed the Cuban flags, read the
placards and some took literature on the case.
For his part, José Rafael Vargas, president of
the Dominican Institute of Telecommunications,
strongly criticized the Supreme Court decision and
said that "this is the time to redouble solidarity,
not to falter."
In Europe, friends in Hungary took the initiative
of translating the statement from the President’s
Office of the Cuban National Assembly of People’s
Power, which was widely distributed in that media,
among members of parliament, intellectuals, friends
in solidarity and political parties.
In Greece, some of its media have reported the
U.S. Supreme Court decision. The online legal
network Lawnet in the Greek version, the newspaper
Rizospastis, the TV station 902 and the radio
station 902 FM Aristerá (Left) all covered it.
In Belgium, representatives of political parties,
national and regional MPs, Euro deputies, and
members of Cuba solidarity organizations sent a
letter to Barack Obama asking him to release the
Five as confirmation of the desire for change
expressed in his presidential election campaign. The
letter, also signed by representatives of trade
union organizations, artists, religious entities and
other nongovernmental organizations of that nation,
reaffirmed their certainty that it is in President
Obama’s power to free the Five.
In Copenhagen, the national leadership of the
Danish Communist Party (KP) issued a statement
expressing that the "refusal once again shows the
arbitrariness that permeates the U.S. justice
system. In addition, it shows the hypocrisy that
characterizes Obama’s comments on an improvement in
relations with Cuba and the so-called ‘war on
terrorism.’" And the statement calls to step up
solidarity with the Five and renewing pressure on
the United States to overturn the unjust sentences
handed down to the Five.
A statement from the Vancouver Committee to Free
the Five issued a call to all peace-loving people in
Vancouver, Canada and throughout the world to unite
in the struggle for their liberation. They "have
never trusted in the honesty that is absent from the
U.S. justice system. They have trusted in the
support of millions of people all over the world who
are fighting for their freedom." And it calls for a
meeting on July 6, 2009 to intensify the campaign
and make the case a priority issue for peace-loving
people in their city and all over Canada.
The arbitrary decision of the U.S. Supreme Court
to not reopen the legal proceedings against our five
heroes was received with indignation in India. The
International Anti-imperialist and People's
Solidarity Coordinating Committee said in a
statement that it is a shame that such a decision
was made without taking note of the opinions of
eminent jurists, statespersons, Nobel laureates and
academics, among others, in addition to the
criticism expressed by the UN Working Group on
Arbitrary Detentions, which described the detention
of the Five as arbitrary and illegal.
The Indian committee’s statement also noted that
it was counterproductive for this to happen when
terrorists are at liberty on the streets of Miami
and preparing terrorist attacks against the people
of Cuba.
Meanwhile, the New Zealand Free the Five
Committee published their opposition to the U.S.
Supreme Court decision to not review the case of the
Five in the Scoop Independent News newspaper.
The text lists the convincing reasons that led
Gerardo Hernández, René González, Ramón Labañino,
Fernando González and Antonio Guerrero to infiltrate
counterrevolutionary organizations operating in
Miami that are responsible for numerous acts of
terrorism against the Cuban people.
Translated by Granma International