Who won the U.S.
budget battle?
Dalia González
Delgado
REPUBLICAN Speaker of the House John
Boehner said October 16, "We fought the good fight,
we just didn’t win," after two weeks of wrangling
for concessions in exchange for the approval of a
new government budget and an increase in the
country’s debt limit. If his party lost, did the
Democrats win? Can Barack Obama consider himself
victorious?
With the agreement reached, the
United Sates was able to avoid a disaster, not only
domestic, but global as well, which would have meant
defaulting on payments due. The solution is, however,
only temporary, since the vote authorized the
Treasury Department to issue more bonds only through
February 7 and keep public entities functioning
through January 16. Will we see a repeat of this
soap opera?
Despite the battle put up by the
Republicans, the party has a mere 28% approval
rating, according to Gallup Polls. This is the
lowest rate ever registered by a major party in the
U.S. and is not only inconvenient for Republicans,
but one more example indicating that the country’s
political system is facing a period of crisis and
readjustment.
Within the divided GOP, the Tea
Party is not faring well. According to the Pew
Research Center, a Washington think tank, 49% of
citizens hold a negative view of the right-wing
grouping, with 30% viewing it positively.
Although these numbers can and do
change, image is important in politics, especially
in the United States where every day appears to be a
campaign day.
The outcome was not negative for
everyone. One of the most intransigent members of
the Tea Party got some attention: Ted Cruz, who
minutes before the Senate vote remained defiant.
Last month, the Senator from Texas, of Cuban origin,
spoke for 21 straight hours on the Senate floor
against Obama’s health care plan. He is one to be
followed, considered a potential candidate for the
2016 Republican Presidential nomination.
Many analysts are giving Obama the
victory in the public battle. It is true that the
President fulfilled his commitment to resist
extortion by those demanding cuts in social spending,
especially in regards to his health care plan, in
exchange for budget approval. But the agreement is
not, as yet, definitive.
Obama is more firm when it comes to
speeches, as opposed to action, and he again
appeared faint-hearted when the time came to make a
decision. He insisted on a bipartisan agreement, but
has not been effective in creating consensus in an
ever more polarized country.
The President said there are no
winners or losers and that the default was avoided
thanks to "responsible" Democrats and Republicans,
saying it was
"not a surprise that the American
people are completely fed up with Washington" In a
brief speech October 17, from the White House, he
indicated that the number one priority which
Congress should address is long-term agreement on
the debt ceiling, followed by immigration reform and
a farm bill.
But if it was difficult to reach
agreement on the budget, can progress be made on
other thornier issues, such as immigration?
There are no winners in this war of
attrition. The 16 days of partial shut-down cost the
U.S. economy at least $24 million, according to
Standard & Poor and worse yet, it is self-inflicted,
unnecessary damage.
Democrats, Republicans and the
President all lost; and above all the U.S. people
lost, with no one in Congress to represent them and
find a solution to the most pressing problems they
face, such as unemployment, which has reached 7.3%.
Jay Carney, White House press
secretary summed up the situation saying, "And
nobody's who's sent here to Washington by the
American people can call themselves a winner... the
American people have paid a price for what's
happened."