|
|
|
STATEMENT BY H.E. MR. FELIPE PEREZ ROQUE, MINISTER
OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF THE REPUBLIC OF CUBA, AT THE OPENING SESSION
OF THE MINISTERIAL SEGMENT OF THE SECOND SOUTH SUMMIT OF THE GROUP
OF 77 AND CHINA, DOHA, QATAR, 13 JUNE 2005
Mr. Chairman;
Dear colleagues:
Our congratulations to the Deputy Prime Minister
and Minister of Foreign Affairs of Qatar and to all his staff on the
excellent work done in preparation for this Second South Summit.
As a host country of the First South Summit, we
really understand the enormous amount of work that our Qatari
colleagues have had to engage in. Our recognition also goes to
Jamaica, our Chair of the G-77 and China.
The Cuban delegation would like to underscore
three key ideas.
First: The socio-economic situation in
most of the 132 countries making up the G-77 and China is now more
dramatic and dangerous than when we held the First Summit in Havana.
At the current rate, it can be empathically stated that not even the
modest goals of the Millennium Summit will be complied with by 2015.
Let us see:
· We set out to
halve by 2015 the 1.276 billion human beings in abject poverty
that existed in 1990. More than 46 million impoverished people
would have to be reduced every year. However, excluding China,
between 1990 and 2000 extreme poverty increased by 28 million
people. Poverty does not diminish; it grows.
· We wanted to
halve by 2015 the 842 million people in starvation around the
world. Some 28 million of them had to be reduced every year.
However, there has been a mere reduction of 2.1 million hungry
people per annum. At this pace, the goal would be achieved by
2215, some 200 years after the foreseen timetable. I am afraid
that by then none of us will be able to see it.
· We proclaimed
the aspiration to reach universal primary education by 2015.
However, more than 120 million children, one in every five in
that school age, do not attend primary schools. According to
UNICEF, at the current rate the goal will be met after 2100.
· We undertook
to reduce by two thirds the mortality rate in children under
five years of age. However, every year continues to see the
death of 13 million children of diseases that can be either
prevented or cured.
The situation is worse, esteemed colleagues, and
there is absolutely no reason for us to make an optimistic
assessment of what is happening. There is an increase in poverty, in
exclusion and an aggravation in the degradation of the environment.
Second: The main reason why, instead of
moving forward, there is a step backwards is that there are no new,
non-conditioned financial resources to implement the programs that
would enable us to meet the Millennium Goals. Our 132 countries are
net providers of financial flows towards the rich, developed
countries. We are poor so that they can squander. That is the gospel
truth.
They are in possession of the money for
investments, of markets and technologies. Out of every 100 new
patents, 86 are owned by developed countries. The gap, far from
diminishing, is on the rise. Let us see:
Some US$ 150 billion is needed to meet the
Millennium Goals. But the money is nowhere to be found. The
developed nations do not show the necessary political will to abide
by their commitments. Beautiful words, but not concrete facts.
However, last year they gave US$ 78 billion in Official Development
Assistance, barely 0.25% of GNP. As we know, the United States gave
only 0.1%. We, on our part:
· Pay more than
US$ 436 billion per annum to developed countries in foreign
debt service; and let us not fool ourselves: the debt
reduction initiatives, including the recent announcement by
the G-8, are barely a drop of water in the desert;
· Pay US$ 100
billion in tariffs so that our products enter their protected
markets;
· In the
meantime, they spend US$ 300 billion per annum on subsidies to
their farmers;
· And the
developed countries are the ones that also spend most of the
trillion dollars used on arms and the trillion dollars used on
commercial advertising.
We must give momentum to South-South cooperation
and, as a matter of fact, we have concretized some actions after the
Summit in Havana, but we must not cease to insist that the countries
in the developed North abide by their commitments. It is their
historic duty. Their wealth has resulted from our colonial
exploitation.
Third: The development-oriented proposals
contained in the document on the UN reform are totally insufficient,
lenient towards the non-compliance by the developed countries and
without any real and innovative proposals.
· There is a
clear imbalance in the priority of the issues addressed, to
the prejudice of the treatment of our right to development,
our access to markets and technologies, and a real solution to
the debt problem;
· On the other
hand, there has been a distortion in the mandate contained in
the Resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly to convene
the High-Level Segment in September. An attempt is being made
to divert attention from the real fact that developed
countries do not comply with their commitments, and that is
the main cause for the non-compliance with the Millennium
Goals.
Cuba believes that it is necessary to
redirect the terms of the debate and turn the High-Level event
into a forum where these issues can be really discussed, where
the blatant default by the developed countries can be looked
into so that they are held accountable for it.
Finally, Mr. Chairman, I would like to express
that Cuba supports the document prepared for this debate by the
President of the G-77, as a policy guideline for the positions of
the Group with regard to the development cluster in the ongoing
reform process.
I hereby reiterate, Mr. Chairman, that you can
count on Cuba’s full cooperation for the successful development of
this debate and in the concretization of agreements that take into
account the legitimate interests of our Group.
Thank you very much.
|
|
|