On March 28, less than two months ago, when Bush proclaimed his
diabolical idea of producing fuel from food, after a meeting with
the most important U.S. automobile manufacturers, I wrote my first
reflection.
The head of the empire was bragging that the United States was
now the first world producer of ethanol, using corn as raw material.
Hundreds of factories were being built or enlarged in the United
States just for that purpose.
During those days, the industrialized and rich nations were
already toying with the same idea of using all kinds of cereals and
oil seeds, including sunflower and soy which are excellent sources
of proteins and oils. That’s why I chose to title that reflection:
"More than 3 billion people in the world are being condemned to a
premature death from hunger and thirst."
The dangers for the environment and for the human species were a
topic that I had been meditating on for years. What I never imagined
was the imminence of the danger. We as yet were not aware of the new
scientific information about the celerity of climatic changes and
their immediate consequences.
On April 3, after Bush’s visit to Brazil, I wrote my reflections
about "The internationalization of genocide."
At the same time, I warned that the deadly and sophisticated
weapons that were being produced in the United States and in other
countries could annihilate the life of the human species in a matter
of days.
To give humanity a respite and an opportunity to science and to
the dubious good sense of the decision-makers, it is not necessary
to take food away from two-thirds of the inhabitants of the planet.
We have supplied information about the savings that could be made
simply by replacing incandescent light bulbs with fluorescent ones,
using approximate calculations. They are numbers followed by 11 and
12 zeros. The first corresponds to hundreds of billions of dollars
saved in fuel each year, and the second to trillions of dollars in
necessary investments to produce that electricity by merely changing
light bulbs, meaning less than 10 percent of the total expenses and
a considerable saving of time.
With complete clarity, we have expressed that CO2 emissions,
besides other pollutant gases, have been leading us quickly towards
a rapid and inexorable climatic change.
It was not easy to deal with these topics because of their
dramatic and almost fatal content.
The fourth reflection was titled: "It is imperative to
immediately have an energy revolution." Proof of the waste of energy
in the United States and of the inequality of its distribution in
the world is that in the year 2005, there were less than 15
automobiles for each thousand people in China; there were 514 in
Europe and 940 in the United States.
The last of these countries, one of the richest territories in
hydrocarbons, today suffers from a large deficit of oil and gas.
According to Bush, these fuels must be extracted from foods, which
are needed for the more and more hungry bellies of the poor of this
Earth.
On May Day 2006, I ended my speech to the people with the
following words:
"If the efforts being made by Cuba today were imitated by all the
other countries in the world, the following would happen:
"1st The proved and potential hydrocarbon reserves
would last twice as long.
"2nd The pollution unleashed on the environment by
these hydrocarbons would be halved.
"3rd The world economy would have a break, since the
enormous volume of transportation means and electrical appliances
should be recycled.
"4th A fifteen-year moratorium on the construction of
new nuclear power plants could be declared."
Changing light bulbs was the first thing we did in Cuba, and we
have cooperated with various Caribbean nations to do the same. In
Venezuela, the government has replaced 53 million incandescent light
bulbs with fluorescent in more than 95% of the homes receiving
electrical power. All the other measures to save energy are being
resolutely carried out.
Everything I am saying has been proven.
Why is it that we just hear rumors without the leadership of
industrialized countries openly committing to an energy revolution,
which implies changes in concepts and hopes about growth and
consumerism that have contaminated quite a few poor nations?
Could it be that there is some other way of confronting the
extremely serious dangers threatening us all?
Nobody wants to take the bull by the horns.
Fidel Castro Ruz
May 22, 2007
5: 10 pm