|
Reflections of Fidel
Genocidal cynicism
(Part I)
(Taken
from CubaDebate)
NO sane person, especially anyone
who has had access to the basic knowledge acquired
in elementary schools, would agree that our species,
particularly children, adolescents or young adults,
should be deprived today, tomorrow and for ever of
the right to live. Throughout all of their hazardous
history, human beings, as persons endowed with
intelligence, have never experienced anything
similar to this.
I feel bound to convey to those who
take the trouble to read these reflections, the
belief that all of us, without exception, have the
obligation to create an awareness of the risks which
humanity is inexorably running, and which are
leading to definitive and total disaster as a
consequence of the irresponsible decisions of
politicians in whose hands chance, rather than
talent or merit, has placed the destiny of humanity.
Whether or not the citizens of their
country are the bearers of religious or skeptical
beliefs in relation to the issue, no human beings in
their right mind would agree that their children or
closest family members should perish in an abrupt
form or as victims of atrocious and torturous
suffering.
In the wake of the repugnant crimes
which the North Atlantic Treaty Organization is
committing with growing frequency under the aegis of
the United States and the richest European countries,
world attention focused on the G-20 meeting, at
which the profound economic crisis currently
affecting all nations had to be analyzed.
International opinion, and particularly that of
Europe, was awaiting a response to the profound
economic crisis which, with its profound social and
even climatic implications, is threatening all the
inhabitants of the planet. That meeting was to
decide whether the euro could be maintained as the
common currency of the largest part of Europe, and
even whether certain countries could remain within
the community.
There was no answer or solution
whatsoever to the most serious problems of the world
economy, despite the efforts of China, Russia,
Indonesia, South Africa, Brazil, Argentina and
others in the emerging economy, desirous of
cooperating with the rest of the world in the search
for solutions to the grave economic problems
affecting it.
The unprecedented event is that,
barely had NATO announced as concluded the operation
in Libya – after the air attack which wounded the
constitutional head of that country, destroyed the
vehicle transporting him and left him at the mercy
of the mercenaries of imperialism, who killed him
and exhibited him as a war trophy, thus offending
Muslim customs and traditions – than the IAEA, a
United Nations body, an institution which should be
at the service of world peace, launched its
political and paid for sectarian report, which is
placing the world on the brink of a war, with the
deployment of nuclear weapons, which the yankee
empire, in alliance with Britain and Israel, is
meticulously preparing against Iran.
After the "Veni, vidi, vici" of the
famous Roman emperor more than 2,000 years ago,
translated into "I came, I saw and he died,"
transmitted to public opinion via an important
television network as soon as the death of Gaddafi
was known, words are surplus to describe the
politics of the United States.
What is important now is the need to
create among the peoples a clear awareness of the
abyss towards which humanity is being led. On two
occasions our Revolution experienced dramatic risks:
in October of 1962, the most critical of all, in
which humanity was on the brink of a nuclear
holocaust; and in mid-1987, when our forces were
confronting racist South African troops equipped
with nuclear weapons which Israel had helped to
create.
The Shah of Iran also collaborated
alongside Israel with the racist and fascist South
African regime.
What is the UN? An organization
promoted by the United States before the end of
World War II. That nation, whose territory was at a
considerable distance from the scenes of war, had
enormously enriched itself; it accumulated 80% of
the world’s gold and under the leadership of
Roosevelt, a sincere anti-fascist, promoted the
development of the nuclear weapon which Truman, his
successor, an oligarch and mediocre president, did
not hesitate to use against the defenseless cities
of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945.
The monopoly of world gold in the
power of the United States and Roosevelt’s prestige
gave him the Bretton Woods agreement, assigning him
the role of issuing the dollar as the sole currency,
which was used for years in world trade, with no
limiting factor other than its backing in metallic
gold.
At the end of World War II, the
United States was also the only country to possess
nuclear weapons, a privilege which he lost no time
in conveying to his allies and members of the
Security Council: Great Britain and France, the two
most important colonial powers in that period.
Truman did not say a word about the
atomic bomb to the USSR before using it. China, then
governed buy the nationalist, oligarchical and pro-yankee
Chiang Kai-shek, could not be excluded from that
Security Council.
The USSR, hard hit by war,
destruction and the loss of more than 20 million of
its sons in the wake of the Nazi invasion, dedicated
huge economic, scientific and human resources to
bring its nuclear capacity up to par with the United
States. Four years later, in 1949, it tested its
first nuclear weapon; the hydrogen bomb in 1953; and,
in 1955, its first megaton bomb. France acquired its
first nuclear weapon in 1960.
Only three countries possessed
nuclear weapons in 1957, when the UN, under yankee
aegis, created the International Atomic Energy
Agency. Can anyone imagine that this U.S. instrument
did anything to warn the world of the terrible risks
to which human society would be exposed when Israel,
an unconditional ally of the United States and NATO,
located right at the heart of the most important oil
and gas reserves in the world, constituted itself as
a dangerous and aggressive nuclear power?
Its forces, in cooperation with
British and French troops, attacked Port Said when
Abdel Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal, property
of France, which obliged the Soviet Prime Minister
to convey an ultimatum demanding an end to that
aggression, which the European allies of the United
States had no alternative other than to obey.
I will continue tomorrow.

Fidel Castro Ruz
November 12, 2011
8:15 p.m.
Translated by Granma
International
-
Reflections
of Fidel
|