Differences with
the Soviets
[... ] Some of these questions are
of a military nature, and it is necessary to treat
them extremely carefully. In any event, I am going
to explain something, by means of example: the
strategic weapons for our defense were not Cuba’s
property. That is not the case of the tanks and a
whole series of weapons which are our property. The
strategic weapons were not our property.
The agreements in virtue of which
they were sent to our country to strengthen our
defenses in the face of threats of attack specify
that those strategic weapons, which are highly
complex and require highly specialized personnel,
would remain under the guidance of Soviet personnel
and would continue being the property of the Soviet
state. For that reason, when the Soviet government
decided to withdraw those weapons, which are theirs,
we respected that decision. I am explaining this so
that it will be understood why their withdrawal was
decided by the Soviet government.
[... ] It has to be said that during
the course of this crisis, during the development of
the crisis, certain differences arose between the
Soviet government and the Cuban government, but I
wish to say one thing to all Cubans: the place where
we must discuss those problems is not here; not here
where it could be very useful to our enemies, who
would take advantage of such discussions. We have to
discuss all of this with the Soviets, at the level
of government and at the level of the [Communist]
Party, we have to sit down and discuss with them
everything that is necessary, in the light of reason
and in the light of principles.
-
October 1962 Missile
Crisis
- If the United States
presumes to humiliate our country, this it will not
achieve!
- A people like this is
invincible!
- Let the United States
start giving evidence of good faith, not with
promises.
Action not words!
- Five Points