2009 already the
most fatal year for occupying soldiers
• THIS year – 2009 – is already the most fatal
year for foreign forces deployed in Afghanistan
since the end of 2001, after five occupying soldiers
– four of them from the U.S. – were killed on August
25, at a time when U.S. public opinion is moving
increasingly against the intervention.
Two U.S. soldiers and another from NATO’s ISAF
unit died the next day in a bomb explosion in the
southern region of that Central Asian country.
A total of 804 U.S. soldiers have died in
Afghanistan over the last eight years. Even though
four months remain until the end of the year, 298
foreign soldiers have already died there, an
increase on the 294 fatalities of 2008, according to
the icasualties.org.
These deaths come at a time when U.S. President
Barack Obama’s strategy on Afghanistan is
increasingly being criticized in his country, where
the majority of the U.S. population is now firmly
against the war.
The U.S. has the largest number (62,000) of the
100,000 foreign soldiers deployed in Afghanistan.
The south, particularly the province of Helmand (the
domain of the Taliban and producer of 55% of the
world’s opium crops) is the most violent region in
the country.
International and Afghani troops have undertaken
countless operations over several months, in
preparation for the elections on Thursday August 20,
losing a significant number of their troops, the
majority of them to homemade bombs.
According to icasualties.org, 66 foreign soldiers
died in August and 298 – of whom 174 are U.S.
soldiers – have died since the beginning of 2009.
The insurrection has considerably intensified and
expanded over the last two years.
The political problem is threatening to intensify
in the United States where Obama could soon announce
the deployment of reinforcements to Afghanistan,
despite the fact that another 21,000 troops were
recently sent to that nation.
His new commander for Afghanistan, General
Stanley McChrystal should request new reinforcements
over the next few weeks, but this would clash 24th
with the wishes of the U.S. people.
On August 24, a Democratic senator demanded for
the first time a withdrawal date for U.S. troops in
Afghanistan, also questioning the effectiveness of
reinforcements.
"It is time to begin the debate over a flexible
calendar so that the people in the United States, in
Afghanistan and the rest of the world see that we
have the intention of withdrawing our troops,"
stated Senator Russell Feingold, who added that a
withdrawal would not signify that his country was no
longer pursuing the Islamist group Al Qaeda.
According to the U.S. media, General McChrystal
is looking at three options: one "high risk" option
that only asks for 15,000 supplementary soldiers; a
"medium risk" alternative calling for 25,000 troops,
and a "low risk" choice which calls for a further
45,000 soldiers. (Taken from an AFP analysis)
•