Mr. President; Gentlemen; Ladies; Your
Excellencies; friends:
I promise you that I am not going to speak longer
than the person who has spoken the most here this
afternoon.
Please allow me an initial comment, which I
should liked to have made as part of the previous
point exercised by the delegations of Brazil, China,
India and Bolivia – we were there asking to speak,
but that was not possible.
The Bolivian representative said – greetings of
course to compañero President Evo Morales –
who is here (Applause), president of the Republic of
Bolivia – among other things – the following – note
this – "The text presented is not democratic, it is
not inclusive."
I was just arriving and we were sitting down when
we heard the president of the previous session, the
minister, saying that a document was coming here,
but nobody knows anything about it. I have asked for
the document; we still don’t have it; I don’t think
anybody knows about that top secret document. Now,
the Bolivian comrade definitely said it: "It is not
democratic, it is not inclusive."
Now, ladies, gentlemen, is that not precisely the
reality of this world? Are we actually in a
democratic world? Can we hope for something
democratic, inclusive from the current world system?
What we are experiencing on this planet is an
imperial dictatorship and from here we continue
condemning it: Down with the imperial dictatorship
and long live the peoples, democracy and equality on
this planet! (Applause)
What we are seeing here is a reflection of that:
exclusion. There is a group of countries which
believe themselves superior to us from the South, to
us from the Third World, to us the underdeveloped or,
as our great friend Eduardo Galeano says, we, the
countries run over by a train that ran over us in
history.
And so, we shouldn’t be surprised by that, we are
not surprised: there is no democracy in the world
and we are here, once again, in the face of powerful
evidence of a world imperial dictatorship.
Two young people got up on the platform here;
fortunately, the agents of order have been decent, a
bit of shoving and pushing, and they cooperated,
right?
There are many people outside, you know? Of
course, they can’t fit in this hall. I have read in
the press that some of them have been arrested, some
intense protests here on the streets of Copenhagen,
and I want to salute all those people who are out
there, most of them young people (Applause). Of
course, they are concerned young people, rightly, I
believe and much more than us, for the future of the
world. The majority of us here have the sun behind
us; they have the sun before them and they are very
concerned.
One could say, Mr. President, that a phantom is
sweeping Copenhagen, paraphrasing Karl Marx, the
great Karl Marx. A phantom is sweeping the streets
of Copenhagen and I believe that that phantom is
moving silently through this hall, moving here and
there among us, it gets into the corridors, comes
out downstairs, it is climbing. That phantom is a
terrifying one, hardly anyone wants to name it.
Capitalism is the phantom! (Applause); hardly anyone
wants to name it, it is capitalism. The people are
praying out there, they can be heard out there.
I was reading some of the slogans painted in the
streets and I think I heard some of those slogans of
these young people when they were moving around out
there. There are two that I took note of; among the
others, two powerful slogans could be heard: One:
"Don’t change the climate, change the system" (Applause)
and I take it as ours: Let’s not change the climate,
let’s change the system and, as a consequence, we
shall begin to save the planet. Capitalism, the
destructive model of development is doing away with
life, it is threatening to definitively do away with
the human species.
The other slogan calls for reflection, very much
in keeping with the banking crisis that spread
throughout the world and is still striking it, and
the way in which the countries of the rich North
came to the aid of the bankers and the big banks;
the United States alone… well, the figure got lost,
it is astronomic, to save the banks. In the streets
they’re saying the following: "If the climate was a
capitalist bank, one of the largest ones, they would
have saved it already," and I believe that that is
the truth (Applause). If the climate was a
capitalist bank, one of the largest, the rich
governments would already have saved it.
I believe that Obama hasn’t arrived, he received
the Nobel Peace prize virtually the same day that he
was sending an additional 30,000 soldiers to kill
innocent people in Afghanistan, and now the
president of the United States is coming to present
himself here with the Nobel Peace Prize.
The United States has a little machine for
printing bills, for making dollars and it has saved…
well, they believe that they’ve saved the banks and
the capitalist system.
Well, this commentary on the margins, which I
wanted to make there, because we were raising our
hands to accompany Brazil, India, Bolivia and China,
in their interesting position firmly shared by
Venezuela and the countries of the Bolivarian
Alliance; but, well, we were not given the floor, so
please don’t discount these minutes from me,
President, it was for that. (Applause)
Well, look, I had the pleasure of meeting here
this French writer, Hervé Kempf. I recommend this
book, I recommend it, it can be obtained in Spanish
– Hervé is somewhere around here – in French as well,
definitely in English, How the Rich Are
Destroying the Earth, by Hervé Kempf. That is
why Christ said: "…it is easier for a camel to go
through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to
enter the kingdom of God." Christ our Lord said that
(Applause).
The rich are destroying the Earth. Could it be
that they are thinking of going to another one when
they have destroyed this one, do they have plans to
go to another planet? To date one cannot see any on
the horizon of the galaxy.
This book has only just come into my hands –
Ignacio Ramonet, who is also here in this hall, gave
it to me – and, at the end of the prologue or
preamble, this sentence is very important. Kempf
says the following: "We will not be able to reduce
material consumption at global level if we do not
force the powerful to descend the ladder a number of
rungs, if we do not combat inequality; what is
needed is for us to add to the ecological principle,
so useful at the moment of becoming aware, the
principle imposed by the situation: to consume less
and to distribute better." I think that is good
advice from that French writer Hervé Kempf.
Well, Mr. President, climate change is, without
any doubt, the most devastating environmental
problem of the present century: flooding, drought,
severe storms, hurricanes, melting ice caps, a rise
in average sea levels, the acidification of oceans
and heat waves; all of that is sharpening the impact
of the global crises that are lashing us.
Current human activity is in excess of the
thresholds of sustainability, thus endangering life
on the planet; but in that we are profoundly unequal,
I wish to recall that. The 500 million richest
people, five hundred million! this is 7%. Seven
percent! Seven [in English] percent of the world
population. That 7% is responsible, those 500
million richest people are responsible for 50% of
contaminating emissions, while the poorest 50% are
responsible for just 7% of contaminating emissions.
For that reason it strikes me that it is a little
strange to put the United States and China on the
same level here. The United States could amount to
possibly 300 million inhabitants; China has a
population that is almost five times larger than the
United States. The United States consumes more than
20 million barrels of oil per day. Chine barely
reaches 5 or 6 million barrels per day. One can’t
ask the same of the United States and China. There
are issues that have to be discussed here. I wish
that, as heads of state and government, we could sit
down and really, really discuss these issues.
So, Mr. President, 60% of the planet’s ecosystems
are damaged, 20% of the earth’s crust is degraded.
We have been the impassive witnesses of
deforestation, land conversion, desertification,
alterations to fresh water systems, over-exploitation
of marine resources, contamination and the loss of
biological diversity. Exacerbated utilization of
land is 30% in excess of its regeneration capacity.
The planet is losing its self-regulation capacity,
the planet is losing that; every day more waste is
released than can be processed. The survival of our
species is hammering on the consciousness of
humanity.
Despite the urgency, two years of negotiations
for concluding a second period of commitments under
the Kyoto Protocol have passed by and we are
attending this meeting without any real and
significant agreement.
And, doubtless, referring to the text that is
coming out of nothing – as some have described it,
the Chinese representative – Venezuela says and the
ALBA countries, the Bolivarian Alliance, say that we
do not accept it, we have said that already, no
other text unless it comes out of the working groups
of the Kyoto Protocol and the Convention, and are
the legitimate texts that have been discussed with
such intensity during these two years and in the
last few days. I believe that you have not slept;
moreover, that you have not had lunch, you haven’t
slept, eh? It does not seem logical to me that a
document should come out of nothing, as you are
saying.
The scientifically sustained objective of
reducing contaminating gas emissions and achieving a
long-term cooperation agreement, evidently, today,
at this hour, seems to have failed, for now. What is
the reason for that? We are not in any doubt, the
reason is the irresponsible attitude and the lack of
political will on the part of the most powerful
nations of the planet. Nobody should feel offended,
I will have recourse to the great José Gervasio
Artigas when he said: "With the truth I neither
offend nor am afraid;" but, in truth, it is an
irresponsible attitude, of marches, of counter-marches,
of exclusion, of an elitist management of a problem
that is of all of us and that only all of us can
solve.
The political conservatism and egotism of the
major consumers, of the richest countries, denotes
an elevated insensibility and lack of solidarity
with the poorest, with the hungry, with those most
vulnerable to disease, to natural disasters.
Mr. President, there is an indispensable need for
a new and sole agreement applicable to absolutely
unequal parties, given the magnitude of their
economic, financial and technological contributions
and capacities and one that is based on unrestricted
respect for the principles contained in the
Convention.
The developed countries must establish binding
commitments which are clear and concrete in respect
of a substantial reduction of their emissions and
assume their obligations of financial and
technological assistance to their poor countries, in
order to confront the destructive dangers of climate
change. In that context, the particular situations
of island states and the most underdeveloped
countries must be fully recognized.
Mr. President, climate change is not the only
problem affecting humanity today; other scourges and
injustices await us, the gap that separates the rich
countries from the poor is still expanding despite
the existence of the Millennium Goals, the Monterrey
Summit on finance, all of these summits – as the
president of Senegal said, denouncing a great truth,
promises and promises and promises that have been
unfulfilled, while the world continues along its
destructive path.
The total income of the 500 richest individuals
on the planet is greater than the income of the 416
million poorest people. The 2.8 billion people who
live in poverty, earning less than one dollar a day,
and who represent 40% of the global population, 40%
of the global population!, receive just 5% of the
global income.
Today, some 9.2 million children die before they
reach their fifth birthday, and 99.9% of those
deaths occur in the poorest countries. Infant
mortality stands at 47 per 1,000 live births; but
the figure for the rich countries is just 5 per
1,000 live births. The average life expectancy
around the world is 67 years of age, in the rich
countries it is 79, while in the poorest countries
it is just 40 years of age.
In addition to this, there are 1.1 billion people
who do not have access to clean potable water; 2.6
billion without health services; more than 800
million illiterate individuals and 1.02 billion
starving people. This is the global scenario.
Now, the cause, what is the cause? We’re talking
about the cause, we cannot shirk our
responsibilities, we cannot evade the seriousness of
this problem. The cause, without doubt – I’m going
back to the same issue – of this entire disastrous
panorama is the metabolic, destructive system of
capital and its embodied model: capitalism.
I have a quote here that I would like to read to
you, from the great liberation theologian Leonardo
Boff, as we know, a Brazilian, from Our America.
On this subject, Leonardo Boff says the following:
"What is the cause? Ah! The cause is the dream of
seeking happiness through the accumulation of
material wealth and unending progress, using science
and technology to achieve this, and with which all
of the Earth’s resources can be exploited," and I
will now mention Charles Darwin and his natural
selection, the survival of the fittest; but we know
that the fittest survive over the ashes of the
weakest.
Jean Jacob Rousseau —— we must also remember him
– said about that: ""Between the weak and the strong,
it is freedom which oppresses." For this reason, the
empire talks of freedom, in order to invade, to
murder, to annihilate, to exploit, that is its
freedom. And Rousseau goes on: "it is the law which
sets free."
There are certain countries which are playing
with the fact that there is no document here,
precisely because they do not want a law, they do
not want an agreement, because the nonexistence of
this agreement allows them to wield their exploiting
freedom, their overpowering liberty.
Let’s make an effort, put pressure on ourselves,
here and out on the streets, so that a commitment
comes out of this conference. So that a statement is
released demanding a commitment from the richest
countries on the Earth! (Applause).
President, Leonardo Boff asks the question – do
you know Boff? I’m not sure whether Boff could come;
I met him recently in Paraguay; we have always read
his work: "Can a finite Earth withstand an infinite
project?" The doctrine of capitalism: infinite
development, is a destructive model, we have to
accept that.
Then Boff asks us: "What can we expect from
Copenhagen?" Just this simple confession: we cannot
continue as we are at present, and one simple
proposal: "Are we going to change our path? Let us
do it, but without cynicism, without lies, without
double agendas, with meaningless documents, with the
truth striding ahead."
Up to what point, we ask ourselves in Venezuela,
Mr. President, ladies and gentlemen, up to what
point are we going to allow so many injustices and
inequalities? For how long are we going to tolerate
the current international economic order and the
market mechanisms in force? Until what point are we
going to allow fierce epidemics such as HIV/AIDS to
devastate entire populations? For how long are we
going to allow hungry people to starve and prevent
them from feeding their own children? For how long
are we going to allow millions of children to
continue dying from curable diseases? For how long
are we going to allow armed conflicts that massacre
millions of innocent human beings, with the aim of
awarding the resources of other nations to the more
powerful ones?
Stop the aggression and the wars, we, the people
of the world are calling on the empires, on those
who are attempting to continue dominating the world
and exploiting us! No more imperial military bases
or coups d’états. Let us build a more just and
equitable social and economic order. Let us
eradicate poverty. Let us bring an immediate end to
high levels of emissions, let us halt environmental
destruction and prevent a climate change catastrophe.
Let us join together in the noble objective of being
more free and driven by solidarity!
Mr. President, a Venezuelan who made his name
almost two centuries ago, the liberator of nations
and the precursor of consciousness, left a
resounding maxim for posterity: "If nature opposes,
we will fight against her and make her obey us."
That was Simón Bolívar, the Liberator.
From Bolivarian Venezuela where, on a day like
today, in fact, exactly 10 years ago, we experienced
the greatest climatic tragedy in our history, the
tragedy of Vargas, that it how it is known; from
that Venezuela whose revolution is attempting to
secure justice for all of its people, the only road
forward is that of socialism…Socialism, the other
phantom of which Karl Marx spoke, is moving around
here too; rather, it’s like a counter-phantom.
Socialism, that is the way forward, that is the path
for the salvation of the planet, I have not the
slightest doubt whatsoever about that. And
capitalism is the road to hell, toward the
destruction of the world.
Socialism, from that Venezuela which is
confronting the threats of the U.S. empire, from the
countries that make up the ALBA, the Bolivarian
Alliance, we are calling for, I respectfully ask for
but, from my heart, I am calling on, on behalf of
many people on this planet, the governments and the
peoples of the world, in paraphrasing Simón Bolívar,
the Liberator: if the destructive nature of
capitalism opposes, then we will fight against it
and we will do what we must; we cannot wait with our
arms folded for the death of humanity.
History is calling us to unite and to fight. If
capitalism resists, we are forced to fight a battle
against capitalism and open the way for the
salvation of the human species. It is up to us,
raising the standards of Christ, of Mohammed, of
equality, love, justice, humanism, of real and
profound humanism. If we do not do that, the most
marvelous creation of the universe, namely human
beings, will disappear! They are going to disappear!
This planet is billions of years old, and has
existed for billions of years without us, the human
race: that is to say, it does not need us to exist.
Now, we cannot live without the Earth, and we are
destroying Pachamama (Mother Earth) as Evo says, as
our indigenous brothers and sisters in South America
say.
Finally Mr. President, now to conclude, we hear
Fidel Castro when he says: "There is an endangered
species: humans". We hear Rosa Luxemburg when she
said: "Socialism or barbarism." We hear Christ, the
Redeemer, when he said: "Blessed are the poor, for
theirs shall be the kingdom of heaven."
Mr. President, ladies and gentlemen, we are
capable of ensuring that this Earth will not be the
grave of humanity; we can make this earth a heaven,
a heaven of life, peace and sisterhood for the whole
of humanity, for the human species.
Mr. President, ladies and gentlemen, thank you
and bon appetit. (Applause).