Contradictions in U.S. foreign policy
(Taken from CubaDebate)
AFTER the G-20 Summit that captured the world’s
attention, news continued arriving via the agencies
on the feverish activity of the man who was the star
in London, Barack Obama, the new president of the
United States, who is approaching the 100th day of
his administration under the scrutinizing regard of
those who closely follow international politics.
With the punctuality of a digital clock, he is
moving from one point to another holding meeting
with political leaders, receiving honors, visiting
cities, giving press conferences, announcing plans,
launching messages and making speeches.
The supersonic G-20 Summit barely concluded, he
left for Strasbourg, France, on the border with
Germany. There, he met on the 3rd with Sarkozy,
happy at not having had to walk out of the G-20
session in London. They covered many problems in
relation to Iran, Afghanistan, Russia, the Near East
and promised to work "hand-in-hand" to construct a
new world. "I do believe that the United States and
Russia, the Europeans and the United States, all
have an interest in preventing Iran from obtaining a
nuclear weapon… In some case we have common
interests with Russia, but we also have some core
disagreements," he stated.
It was announced that both of them, Obama and
Sarkozy, would participate in the NATO summit of 26
countries, scheduled to begin that afternoon in the
German town of Baden-Baden and to end the following
day in Strasbourg.
Before leaving he stated that "the more
capability we see here in Europe, the happier the
United States will be, the more effective we will be
in coordinating our activities."
"We're not looking to be the patron of Europe.
We're looking to be partners with Europe."
He left Strasbourg for Baden-Baden to meet with
Chancellor Angela Merkel prior to a dinner for the
26 heads of state and government of NATO, plus those
of Croatia and Albania, which have applied for entry.
The summit would serve as an opening to the 60th
anniversary of that military organization. There
they proposed to discuss relations with Russia,
which "reached their lowest point last August after
the Russian-Georgian war."
Another objective was to discuss a renovation of
the Alliance’s strategic action concept, which dates
back to 1999, in order to adapt it to new threats.
Afterward, they would discuss the situation of
Afghanistan and Kosovo.
In Strasbourg that same day, the 3rd, Obama met
with more than 3,000 French and German youth and
made a brief speech which will be much talked of in
the future on account of its bold content.
"So I've come to Europe this week to renew our
partnership… America is changing, but it cannot be
America alone that changes." He then announced the
content of the speech that he would give in Prague
on nuclear proliferation and affirmed that his goal
was: "a world without nuclear weapons."
At another point he added: "Even with the Cold
War now over, the spread of nuclear weapons or the
theft of nuclear material could lead to the
extermination of any city on the planet."
The world’s growing concern at the vast
destructive and exterminating power of those weapons
is unquestionable and is linked to the concern of
other states, and in particular of U.S. society
itself, over the risk of nuclear sabotage. That is
what Obama was literally expressing with his phrase:
"the theft of nuclear material could lead to the
extermination of any city on the planet."
On April 4, speaking at the NATO Summit, he
welcomed Croatia and Albania into the fold of that
military body, which brings its total membership to
28. The president of the United States noted that
140 Albanian and 296 Croat soldiers have already
provided their services in Afghanistan. "I believe
they will both be strong contributors to the
alliance."
The contradictory ways in which the ideas of the
U.S. president are expressed are evident.
"The door to membership will remain open for
other countries that meet NATO standards and can
make a meaningful contribution to allied security."
The EFE agency explains that "Russia is highly
critical of NATO’s expansion toward the east and, in
particular, toward the ex-Soviet Republics which it
considers its natural area of influence."
"The alliance promised last year during its April
Summit in Bucharest a possible way forward for the
entry of Ukraine and Georgia, supported by Obama’s
predecessor George W. Bush," the cable reports.
Does anybody by any chance doubt the fact that
NATO is a bellicose and aggressive organization,
which is not only threatening Russia but also other
countries in any part of the world? Could the
torture centers of Guantánamo have been created and
sustained without the cooperation of many of the
NATO countries?
Once again the boldness and the contradictions
were expressed in the first European Summit of the
president of the United States with the European
Union in Prague. He promised "to lead efforts for a
world without nuclear weapons."
"We cannot succeed in this endeavor alone, but we
can lead it."
He concretely stated that he would attempt to
achieve a rapid end of nuclear testing and confirmed
his pretension to seek Senate approval for the
Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty.
"He likewise advocated a global summit on nuclear
security to take place next year," the news agencies
report.
It was also announced that "Obama was woken up to
be informed of the launch of a North Korean rocket
that apparently overflew Japan. He asked the UN
Security Council to make a firm response to the
provocation in an emergency meeting convened for
that same Sunday."
The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea
announced on March 12 that it was to launch a
communications satellite between April 4 and 8 as
part of a special program with peaceful ends. That
was known when Obama spoke in Strasbourg to French
and German youth.
On being informed in Prague, he drew up a
statement in which he said: "Rules must be binding,"
he said. "Violations must be punished. Words must
mean something."
Launching a rocket to place a means of
communication in orbit, test a technology or take a
tourist for a ride is not a crime, except when that
is done by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea,
which does not belong to the club of the strongest
and those with the resources to apply that
sophisticated technology. Japan took advantage of
the situation to adjust its anti-satellite missiles
and improve its defense without anybody questioning
that right.
I think it was an exaggeration to wake Obama up
in the early hours.
Before leaving Prague he said to a meeting of
30,000 people: "For if we believe that the spread of
nuclear weapons is inevitable, then we are admitting
to ourselves that the use of nuclear weapons is
inevitable… Human destiny will be what we make of it."
This affirmation has in itself great force. However,
he added afterward that the missile shield that the
United States is planning in European territory is a
program in response to Iranian nuclear threats. Such
an affirmation, on the other hand, is not congruent
with the truth and I do not understand his
reiteration.
Russia rejects that missile shield plan and
considers that it is expansionist, and thus is
demanding its cancellation.
He arrived in Turkey in the evening of Sunday the
5th.
After meeting with Turkish leaders on Monday in
Ankara, the capital of that Eurasian nation and
giving a speech in Parliament, he announced that he
was to travel to Istanbul to attend the 2nd Forum of
the Alliance of Civilizations.
In Prague he had promised to support Turkey’s
entry into the European Union, which is opposed by
France, Germany and others.
He called once again in Ankara for Turkey’s entry
into the European Union. He noted, however, that
Turkey needed to make efforts to reinforce the state
of law.
On arriving in that country, the first thing that
he did was to pay tribute to the founder of the
Turkish nation, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk.
"We will be respectful, even when we do not agree,"
he declared before Parliament. Another phrase in
itself of profound content.
"The United States is not and will never be at
war with Islam," he stated.Thousands of Turks had
taken to the streets to protest against the politics
of the United States.
The president of the United States concluded his
visit on the 7th at 02:20 hours in Istanbul,
Turkey’s principal city, after an exhausting tour of
eight days.
His last meeting was with students. He called on
the young people to extend bridges between Islam and
the West. According to EFE, he urged Muslims to
ignore "caricatures" depicting U.S. citizens as
ignorant or insensitive and assured them that, "that
is not the country that he loves."
The facts narrated reflect the complexity of the
tasks that Obama is carrying on his shoulders.
He had declared in all frankness: "Within four or
eight years people will be able to say whether I
have followed the same policies or whether things
have changed."
Although the bearer of the contradictions noted,
with a full bill of health, like a work machine with
an agile mind, the Black president undertook his
first visit abroad with unquestionable political
results.
Without any doubt, he does not resemble his
predecessor in any way.

Fidel Castro Ruz
April 8, 2009
7:11 p.m.