Changing Course
On Cuba
(08/10/06 – Forbes)
Commentary
William A. Reinsch and Jake Colvin
Days before Cuban President Fidel Castro
announced that he was emporarily ceding power, U.S.
policymakers presented a report to Congress that
recommended providing assistance to Cuba only when
requested by a democratic transition government. The
message, it seems, is that the United States will
continue to isolate Cuba now and for the foreseeable
future.
The problem with this strategy is that
withholding engagement until a genuinely democratic
government emerges in Cuba is the surest way to
minimize the influence of our ideas, values and
access in a post-Castro Cuba. Congress and the
president should not be content to adopt a wait-and-see
attitude as historic changes unfold.
presents an extraordinary opportunity for the
United States to reconsider its policies toward Cuba
and allow for increased exchanges, humanitarian aid
and commerce. If the Cuban people are to believe
that they have no better friend than the United
States, and if we are to hold any hope of spreading
our values and ideas later, then we must begin to
engage now.
Sanctions hinder the ability of American citizens
to promote U.S.
alues. Since President <http://www.forbes.com/2001/10/12/gwbush.html>George
W. Bush took office, the U.S. government has
dramatically curtailed approved legal travel and
divided families by restricting travel and
remittances by Cuban Americans. Without regular
contact with the Cuban people, we have little hope
of promoting our values and way of life.
U.S. sanctions also disadvantage American
businesses and agriculture producers in a nearby and
natural market for U.S. goods and services.
Since Congress legalized U.S. exports of food and
medicine to Cuba in 2000, trade with Cuba has grown
from virtually nothing to approximately $380 million
in 2004. However, sanctions prevent American
companies from taking advantage of broader trade
opportunities, while those firms that can export to
Cuba face certain limitations on financing and
travel.
The security implications of our policy toward
Cuba are also troubling. As Cuba continues to
develop its energy sector and allows nations like
China and Venezuela increasingly broad access to its
economy and natural resources, we should consider
the implications for our own security and economic
well-being.
It will take time and effort to sort through the
layers of regulations and legislation that have
accumulated over the more than four decades since
Castro came to power. Congress, the president and
the private sector should take steps immediately to
revisit these restrictions and promote increased
contact with Cuba.
First, and perhaps most importantly, Congress
should act quickly to roll back the elements of the
embargo that inhibit assistance to Cuba, beginning
with the immediate repeal of the 1996 Helms-Burton
law. Removing the law from the books would restore
flexibility to the president and allow him to
respond to changing circumstances in Cuba.
Second, the president should take steps to
rescind the harsh restrictions on travel and
remittances that were instituted in 2004, which
further limited travel by students, private citizens
and Cuban Americans. Even better, the administration
ought to consider revoking the entire travel ban to
allow regular contact between Americans and Cubans.
Finally, the U.S. private sector and
nongovernmental organizations have an important role
to play. From church groups to humanitarian
organizations to private businesses and trade
associations like ours, it is important to make
clear to our elected officials our desire for a
change in U.S. policy. We must also stand ready to
engage our counterparts and constituencies in Cuba
when these changes come.
essary to start changing direction now. Until U.S.
policy changes, American businesses, educators,
religious groups and humanitarian organizations will
remain on the sidelines as a new era dawns.
We do not have to know what is coming next in
Cuba to recognize that we need to chart a new course
in the United States. The time to act is now.
William A. Reinsch is president of the National
Foreign Trade Council, a trade association based in
Washington, D.C. Jake Colvin is director of USA*Engage,
a project of the council that advocates dialog and
engagement abroad.