The ghost of the
war in Viet Nam appears
BY JIM CASON AND
DAVID BROOKS, Correspondents for La Jornada
WASHINGTON AND NEW YORK, May 26.— "The
answer is blowing in the wind" sang Bob Dylan – 63
years old this week – in the 1960s. That memory of
the past is beginning to invade the present with
inevitable comparisons to the days of Viet Nam and
Watergate, political polarization, dead soldiers,
demands for the political trial of the president,
and even nostalgia for the 1960s in advertising
campaigns by transnational firms.
Perhaps the only difference is the
official enemy.
Before it was communism, today it is
"terrorism."
In the last few days, with certain
radio programs celebrating Dylan’s music as a
backdrop, a wide range of events and news mark the
return of those days of Viet Nam and Watergate.
Firstly, the ghost of the war in
Viet Nam is beginning to do the rounds of the
country. The almost 800 U.S.-flag covered coffins
arriving from a country that the vast majority of
U.S. people probably could not locate on a map of
the world are beginning to cause doubts over a
military conflict that is out of control. Another
intervention or invasion to "defend freedom" and,
once again in the name of "human dignity," come
revelations of atrocities committed by U.S. forces.
Seymour Hersh, the same reporter who
exposed the My Lai massacre to the world, is now
revealing U.S. atrocities in Iraq. Surveys are
starting to show a turnaround in the public’s
opinion, formerly steadfast in their support for
official propaganda but now doubting its veracity,
the same thing that happened more than three decades
ago.
And just like the end of the 1960s
and the start of the 1970s, a series of lies and
deception, both in terms of the war and national
politics and the concealment of these acts, has
provoked an open debate on the need to remove the
president from office.
Journalist Carl Bernstein – who
together with Bob Woodward revealed the events that
would finally lead to Richard Nixon’s resignation
over the Watergate scandal – wrote this week that 30
years ago a president was forced to resign for
unprecedented crimes that he and his assistants
committed in violation of the constitution and
against the people of the United States. The famous
question at that time is once again relevant, stated
Bernstein. What did the president know and when did
he know it?
In an article published this week in
the USA Today national newspaper, Bernstein
wrote that today the United States is facing another
ill-considered war, conceived with ideological
fervor and developed with disdain for the truth,
ignoring history and possessing the arrogant
assertion of U.S. might that has shocked and
alienated a large part of the world, including its
traditional allies. At a moment in history when the
United States needed a president to lead an
international campaign against terrorism and its
causes in an intelligent and firm manner, Bush
decided to unilaterally declare war on a
totalitarian state that never represented a
terrorist threat; declaring exemption from
international law over the treatment of prisoners;
and the suspension of constitutional guarantees for
non-combatants at home and abroad, he added.
In this case, says Bernstein, the
subject could not be "the serious crimes and minor
infractions" – the constitutional term that refers
to the facility to remove the president as employed
in the case of Nixon – but better still Bush’s
failure, or his inability to be a competent and
honest leader.
Ralph Nader, leading defender of
citizens’ and consumers’ rights and now an
independent presidential candidate, described Bush
this week as a "Messianic militarist" who should be
removed for taking the country to a war against Iraq
on false pretences. In a speech to the prestigious
Council on Foreign Relations, Nader – another
veteran of the 1960s wars – said that Bush had
exceeded his authority by ordering the invasion in
the face of widespread opposition both inside and
outside the country, a fact he believe is at the
level of "serious crimes and minor infractions" as
laid down in the constitution.
Meanwhile, the war continues to
generate anxiety and concern just like the last
years of Viet Nam. On May 30, well-known cartoonist
Garry Trudeau – author of the Doonesbury comic strip
that appears in thousands of newspapers in the
United States and worldwide, and who has been
censored for his open criticism of the war –published
all the names of the U.S. soldiers who have died in
Iraq, reported the British daily The Guardian.
The paper commented that he did so just one month
after the ABC Nightline news program dedicated its
transmission to reading out the names of the U.S.
casualties of this conflict.
Another veteran of the Viet Nam war
is the Democrat presidential candidate, and he is
facing another contemporary of that era, one who did
everything possible to avoiding being mobilized but
who is leading and glorifying this one today.
However, in the political debate between these two
1960s veterans, no one would dare to condemn this
war, now that it would be anti-patriotic to do so
and a "betrayal" of soldiers risking their lives
there. As comedian Lewis Black commented: "The
Democrat Party is the party with no ideas; the
Republican Party is the one with bad ideas
¼
There’s nothing worse than a Democrat and a
Republican when they decide to work together."
The wars, far away from this
country, from where only selected images arrive and
almost always conceal the worst, the unbearable –
thanks to the cooperation of the mainstream media –
have the effect of imposing limits on traditional
political debate in the United States.
Just like during the long years of
Viet Nam, every day more evidence is disclosed of
lies and official cover ups of abuse and
justifications for the war. That is, there are
likewise elements present from a time when one word
was born to sum up violations of the law, official
lies and cover-ups: Watergate.
The political implications of the
ghosts of Viet Nam and Watergate in this climate
will be seen over the next five months, culminating
in the presidential election. And perhaps they won’t
stop there. A veteran reporter in Washington recalls
that although Nixon committed a series of crimes and
deceptions before the election, he succeeded in
being overwhelmingly reelected. However, he was
forced to abandon the presidency in the midst of his
second term when his destiny caught up with him.
NOSTALGIA IN ADVERTISING
Meanwhile, with such nostalgia for
the 1960s, the transnational companies have decided
to employ certain aspects of the opposition of that
era to sell their products. The energy firm Shell
has a commercial in which a mother recalls her
"hippie" days, saying something like in that summer
we thought that all we needed was love, "that a
flower could stop a bullet" and that solar power
could resolve all our problems. The former hippie is
now a Shell engineer and affirms that one out of
three isn’t bad and that Shell is the principal
generator of solar energy.
The KIA automobile firm invites us
to a "summer festival of peace, love and savings" in
its new campaign. Others are using 1960s rock music
to promote their products. They obviously understand
that one sector of consumers they want to attract is
the "Viet Nam generation".
But as national columnist and
Jornada contributor Molly Ivins warns, the
scandal of U.S. abuse in Iraq, the revelations of
secret orders in violation of the Geneva Convention,
and the attempt to cover up all of this offers proof
that the highest levels of government are concealing
from and deceiving the public over what is actually
occurring in this war. "One can read all the memos
and documents that one likes," she wrote this week
in reference to the revelations of the last few
weeks. "It is important to know how fascism begins."
Or perhaps it’s time to sing Dylan’s
"Masters of War" once more.